InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2010

Re: JERSEYHAWG post# 83611

Wednesday, 04/10/2019 10:06:40 AM

Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:06:40 AM

Post# of 111126
jers,

I don't know either.

Made the call.

LBHI attorneys doubt new claim filings will go anywhere.

I'm glad the Pro Se filings were made to the Court with the Guarantee.

It seems there is a clear differentiator: Guaranteed Claims, Guaranteed Claims with Subordination and Non-Guaranteed Claims without Subordination.

How can Guaranteed Claims with Subordination be classified with Claims without the Guarantee?

Does anyone have a clean answer for that?

Hasn't it rendered the 5-year deferment obsolete?

It pre-empted any effort to re-instate the Trust and they piled on with the stay.

So, pay treble damages.

All the attorneys have been paid while they've used the legal system to over look CT prospectus and Guarantee.

And, the Bankers sit at the Discount Window for 0.0% money.

Have you determined how much 0.0% money Banks can get while not re-instating ~$75M yearly debt service on a $1.2B Trust?

Figure it out at 0.25%.

mojo