InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 1695
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/10/2010

Re: enthalpy post# 84873

Wednesday, 04/10/2019 7:27:19 AM

Wednesday, April 10, 2019 7:27:19 AM

Post# of 95209
Where we'll "agree to disagree" is the why, which translates to the privacy aspect. The upside of reversing merging entities is obviously the potential for a huge boost to the family's net worth.

But AR will be 74 soon, Mohammed at 51 had major health issues last year, Sharif is 69, Heinl will be 75 in May...I'm not saying age means you can't accomplish things, but do these guys really have what it takes to build a "privacy shield" of some sort and then have the clatter of investors & regulators constantly swinging and hacking at it, knowing full-well that the privacy they so deeply want to protect could actually backfire and decrease their net worth if the market doesn't agree? At this point in their lives, I don't see them taking that risk.

I'm concluding that its not about the money at all, rather, philanthropic - adding to their legacy in a different way. I.E. the unending commitment to Albania for what we see as illogical reasons (because we dont know why), the non-profit glowparks for people to enjoy (sharing happiness), being advocates for growth of certain sports in the UAE (that have so deeply impacted them).

I know I'm making A LOT of assumptions that could totally be wrong. However this is my assimilation of the current evidence without fully understanding the WHY.