Phunware Inc (PHUN)

[SecretMillionaire]

Thank you, Phun.

So, based on your testimony, I can safely conclude that there are naked shorts AND a cashless exchange occurred. Because it is a *fact* that the sho Reg list will read a cashless exchange the same way as a naked short.

If you know exacly what happened, how, and why, I would ask that you quit sidestepping like a politician and give us full disclosure.

From your own source, that you yourself came in here as a reputable source, Cordelo has shown us testimony of someone exercising his right to the cashless exchange. Because YOU missed the deadline. Intenionally or not, that is a fact. So they could indeed exercise and you got NO CASH from that exercise; is that right? Can you deny that is what happened?

IFF there are shorts also, which is your testimony, then you are under attack both ways. Now, why are shorts here? To cover low, I would presume. They didn't choose an overvalued target did they? No, they chose to target Rangers on the low ground. So, you are scrambling under fire.

Get this ship under control, please. I want in at $2.00 and not a penny more. I have so valutation concerns now, and I'm getting a little squirmish at all the half-answers.

The facts are going to continue to be interpreted here, and the conclusions will never contradict the evidence. Now, your testimony does not contract the evidence so far either -- shorts and a cashless exchange occurred. My conclusion plus your conclusion. Can you falsify that? Can you rule it out with evidence?

A cashless exchange means you received no cash and were diluted for no good reason whatsoever. Would that be correct?