Wednesday, April 03, 2019 6:28:56 PM
And to respond to your edit, I can understand the fear of failure from going it alone, but I don't consider that to be disqualifying. Nobody expects the current employees to have that expertise - they'd have to bring that on. Is there execution risk? For sure, but it could very well be worth it. Plus, the anecdotal evidence that "others have failed" doesn't bother me a bit, because every situation is unique.
Royalty rates in licensing/partnership deals are intended to capture the financial risk/reward ratio that a financially-sponsoring partner takes on in the development process. I.e. the more uncertainty there is over the future of the drug, the higher the royalty split for the BP would have to be to compensate them for the risk that their financial investment will not bear fruit. And most deals are struck early in the development process, somewhere between pre-clinical and P2. As a result, most of the royalty rates heavily favor the BP, and leave the developing company with peanuts, relatively.
It's very rare that deals occur when the developing company is already in the process of filing a BLA. You can make those odds even longer by saying that said drug is novel in it's field, had never had an SAE reported in any of it's trials, and plays in a relatively big and splashy field (HIV). I don't really think there's a comp for this out there, and I'd be willing to bet that the hold up is that BP's are trying to wring out royalty rates that they're accustomed to getting, without shouldering much of the financial burden and even less of the risk. If they're unwilling to budge, I'm all for CYDY making the play to go it alone rather than just hand BP several billion in revenue annually for the convenience of not having to build a marketing team. Those that take the risk should get the reward.
I think someone will eventually budge and give "good enough" royalty rates on HIV that CYDY will bite. Maybe 50/50. For a big HIV player trying to steal market share, it's a win/win/win. Take little risk on the drug, make money, and drink Gilead's milkshake in the process. For CYDY, the real prize is cancer. The ability to keep that revenue for itself - or just dictate terms of a commercialization deal - could end up being a financial win massive implications for company value.
Please note that this wasn't written to educate you on anything, so don't feel patronized. Just putting my thoughts on paper, so to speak.
Royalty rates in licensing/partnership deals are intended to capture the financial risk/reward ratio that a financially-sponsoring partner takes on in the development process. I.e. the more uncertainty there is over the future of the drug, the higher the royalty split for the BP would have to be to compensate them for the risk that their financial investment will not bear fruit. And most deals are struck early in the development process, somewhere between pre-clinical and P2. As a result, most of the royalty rates heavily favor the BP, and leave the developing company with peanuts, relatively.
It's very rare that deals occur when the developing company is already in the process of filing a BLA. You can make those odds even longer by saying that said drug is novel in it's field, had never had an SAE reported in any of it's trials, and plays in a relatively big and splashy field (HIV). I don't really think there's a comp for this out there, and I'd be willing to bet that the hold up is that BP's are trying to wring out royalty rates that they're accustomed to getting, without shouldering much of the financial burden and even less of the risk. If they're unwilling to budge, I'm all for CYDY making the play to go it alone rather than just hand BP several billion in revenue annually for the convenience of not having to build a marketing team. Those that take the risk should get the reward.
I think someone will eventually budge and give "good enough" royalty rates on HIV that CYDY will bite. Maybe 50/50. For a big HIV player trying to steal market share, it's a win/win/win. Take little risk on the drug, make money, and drink Gilead's milkshake in the process. For CYDY, the real prize is cancer. The ability to keep that revenue for itself - or just dictate terms of a commercialization deal - could end up being a financial win massive implications for company value.
Please note that this wasn't written to educate you on anything, so don't feel patronized. Just putting my thoughts on paper, so to speak.
Recent CYDY News
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/21/2026 04:15:12 AM
- Form 424B3 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(3)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/20/2026 09:08:39 PM
- CytoDyn to Present at the LD Micro Invitational XVI • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/15/2026 12:30:00 PM
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 05/11/2026 01:00:00 PM
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/11/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 08:32:50 PM
- CytoDyn Announces First Patient Dosed in Expanded Access Program for Leronlimab in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/27/2026 12:30:00 PM
- CytoDyn to Host Investor Webcast • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/23/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form S-1 - General form for registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/22/2026 09:21:50 PM
- CytoDyn Presents New Leronlimab Data in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer at AACR Annual Meeting 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/22/2026 12:30:00 PM
- CytoDyn Completes Enrollment in Phase 2 Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Study • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/21/2026 08:10:00 PM
- CytoDyn Presents New Leronlimab Data in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer at AACR Annual Meeting 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/20/2026 12:30:00 PM
- CytoDyn to Present at the AACR Annual Meeting 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/14/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 424B3 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(3)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 09:15:18 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 12:30:28 PM
- Form 424B3 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(3)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/25/2026 09:16:10 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 09:24:23 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 09:23:14 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 09:22:42 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 09:21:33 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 09:20:57 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 09:20:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/24/2026 09:15:24 PM
- CytoDyn Presents at AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Brain Cancer • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/24/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 424B3 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(3)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 09:15:18 PM
