InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,346.56
(
-1.84%
)
US TECH 100
17,080.00
(
-4.85%
)
Dow Jones
39,737.26
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
75.31
(
-2.36%
)
Bitcoin
51,240.78
(
-11.43%
)
Post# of 146251
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

trader59

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 194
Posts 16656
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 01/29/2018

trader59

Member Level

Re: CSCS post# 66848

Monday, 04/01/2019 1:08:22 PM

Monday, April 01, 2019 1:08:22 PM

Post# of 146251
And those contracts could have been taken by the buyers of the assets if they'd agreed to pay the roughly $400k of royalties that were due, but they chose not to. Had they done that, the 2 secured creditors who get some recovery would have had a few bucks more. Clearly the value of the contracts is being grossly exaggerated in an attempt to sell stock.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up