Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[Positive NRG]

“These patents are too general. I'm surprised they even got a patent and won IPR challenges. Seems the PTAB didn't examine the details good enough”

So you believe that ONE federal court judge can understand patented technology better than a 3 judge panel at the PTAB AND the patent office themselves. That those experts who spent YEARS designing and wording this tech and patents to the point where they were finally accepted, I guess, KNOWING these patents would be scrutinized to hell and back, would risk “being too vague”????? I’m sorry, but that’s total BS. I’d put my money on the fact that something is not on the up and up. Koe has never sided against Apple, as far as I’ve seen, which makes it far easier to believe there is some sort of bias involved here. She never even gave VP an opportunity to justify their claims that it is NOT vague, as she states. All this is is another stall tactic that successfully went Apple’s way, unfortunately. I’m anxiously awaiting the appeal. There is just NO WAY these patents could have survived the process as long as they have if they were as simplistically vague as she claims.