well, that's why it can be said there are many who look but can not see and mean who listen but can not hear.
if someone can not explain in a couple of paragraphs why they think lampert will acquire what's left of shc which he does not already own, i feel they have a distinct misunderstanding and mis-comprehension of what is going on and what is going to happen.
an inability or refusal to support a position so firmly held makes it seem to be on pretty shaky ground.
for anyone who has bothered to read my posts, they know at one time i held 40k shares of this stock and that i sold all of them.
they also know i am continuing to look at everything i can to see if my evaluation of this stock is incorrect.
they also know i have stated on this board if i find that to be the case i would get back in and be satisfied with a return of 2x to 5x.
that's why i keep looking and keep posting to this board but those who are just too busy to explain on any type of factual basis why they believe this stock is going to survive aren't really doing much to satisfy the questions which are still unanswered.
when i post and refer to old sears and new sears, it is being done to clarify what i'm saying. when others post and just indiscriminately refer to sears, without any clarification, no only do i have a hard time understand what is being said, but it leaves me believing the poster has no idea about what is going on.
