InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 7222
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/28/2004

Re: None

Tuesday, 03/12/2019 10:56:18 AM

Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:56:18 AM

Post# of 111073
I would like to see significant news as much as the next long, and NO disrespect to CF or any traders here, but IMHO, I don’t think hammering the COO for more frequent news will (a) do anything, or (b) could be detrimental. CELZ is letting out facts as they see fit, either through the shareholder updates or the Social Media posts. When big enough news is ready, I am certain they will release it.

The last time we hammered him with email we got the following in a shareholder update…. “Again, in response to direct inquiries from shareholders seeking specific information on operating activities, it is our policy to release information via press releases and SEC filings. We understand the desire for real time information, however information must be properly disclosed to the public. Advanced information provided to individuals could present an unfair advantage and thus cannot be disclosed. We appreciate our shareholders understanding of our policy to comply with all regulations on this matter.”

One of the things I like best about CELZ is that the CEO and COO are NOT Chummy with investors and reply. That would be a red flag IMHO.

Let’s see who the next three doctors are that will be trained this month and April. Are they new names, or old names? And does it matter?

I think CELZ is charging ahead just fine, albeit slower than many would like. The PPS is a HUGE point of disagreement, but good or bad, it won’t stay here long. You know my chips are pushed to the middle of the table :) I keep thinking Medistem ;)
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CELZ News