InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 641
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/04/2013

Re: gastric post# 77006

Monday, 03/11/2019 1:41:17 PM

Monday, March 11, 2019 1:41:17 PM

Post# of 130164
It's not yet been asked to. That is in the process of being done right now, at this juncture.

The proof lies, as I have outlined before - and I believe, in response to you, specifically, if I am not mistaken, in the actions of Apple.

Apple had many other options, most importantly, to simply ignore the patent filings altogether.

But they did not. If they are not infringing, why would they care? Why would they file to overturn the patents? Why would they fight years and years on end, brief after brief, expert testimony, after expert testimony...attorney fee after attorney fee to respond to something that they aren't EVEN DOING??? That, my friend would be insanity.

If I were a cobbler, and someone erroneously accused me of stealing their patented application for installing zippers in dresses, I can assure you, I would lift no finger, nor pay any solicitor to disprove their lunacy.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News