InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 43
Posts 2425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2016

Re: finesand post# 38391

Friday, 03/08/2019 4:53:14 PM

Friday, March 08, 2019 4:53:14 PM

Post# of 233005
fine- you said, "Maybe SC is hard with these amount? I don't know.
But in such case, they could have used IV for higher amounts, as we need to proof the MOA on dosage escalation and not convenience. "

For Pete's sake. Go back and listen to CC how the Dr's in the trials wanted to raise the dosage but CYDY was cautious of increasing the amount via the injection site. Any reaction at injection site would've thrown an undeserved curve ball at CYDY. They elected to increase dosage via splitting between each arm knowing no reaction has ever occurred but the end result dosage increase will be available. Smart cautious move.
IV would require complete rewrite/restart goals etc with FDA. Expense, thru the roof.
They made the right move and increased dosage by injecting increase in each arm.
Chump


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News