InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2017

Re: sjacobs26 post# 37980

Thursday, 02/28/2019 4:59:31 PM

Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:59:31 PM

Post# of 232915
Yeah, I think that the key may be recognizing what counts as an accredited investor and comparing that to the minimum Paulson investments required. To be an accredited investor:

1) Be worth over $1mm, excluding primary residence, or:

2) Make over $250k for the last three years.

Neither of those necessarily and definitively put you in a place where a minimum investment of $50k in an OTC stock is a comfortable or easy thing to carry. However, if you can put in $50k, take out $52k, and keep warrants? That becomes very doable. I would guess that regardless if potential outcomes, the vast majority of individual accredited investors simply don’t want to carry $50k+ of exposure to an OTC stock if they can keep warrant exposure for free. Simply too large a portion of liquid net worth.

I’m with BL and finesand on this one. And if Paulson + OTC doesn’t fully explain the SP, I bet it explains 95% of it.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News