InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3183
Posts 208744
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/04/2004

Re: boston127 post# 38876

Friday, 02/22/2019 9:14:08 AM

Friday, February 22, 2019 9:14:08 AM

Post# of 163961
Thanks boston, EMA isn't the only OTC funder who tries this trick! And the reason they do it is because it's simply a numbers game for them. They know that a large percentage of OTC CEO's are simply figureheads of flat broke start ups who need to rely on aged debt funding just to pay their bills from month to month right!

So the majority of the time they pull these dirty court tricks they end up succeeding because the CEO's of the OTC PubCo's they sue don't even have the money to hire a lawyer or show up in court.

But everyone should be more than well aware that the court system in America is 100% designed from "common sense" and "logic" when factoring in both sides of the stories presented to them right!

So when VYST clearly shows the judge multiple attempts to provide EMA with good faith final payment on their remaining note balances with interest I might add...the judge is not going to view EMA favorably for blatantly declining payment with interest, then turning right around and suing for such a blatantly obvious outrageous amount of shares right!

The total amount of shares in the EMA suit is approx. 27M shares...on 2 notes that had only a few grand remaining to be paid on them with a bit of interest on top! So talk about a crystal clear case of what the heck is wrong with our court systems right...as it's absolutely outrageous that EMA is trying to sue for approx. $2M worth of stock on 2 notes they had already been converting for months and were barely owed any remaining monies and interest payments on!

So I have no doubt whatsoever that VYST's CEO did multiple attempted good faith payment attempts and has the paper trail to prove it...and my own opinion is that the judge does 1 of those 3 options I summarized because the court systems aren't designed to rule on anything other than what's the most legal, logical and fair outcome in any of the matters brought before them...and nobody in their right mind could possibly think that EMA could somehow convince the courts to give them $2M worth of stock they already converted multiple conversion rounds on and made money on already before declining to accept payments on the last small amount of cash and interest remaining on the 2 notes in question k cheers!


Never buy or sell based on my posts! My posts are just my opinion!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VYST News