InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 675
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/07/2018

Re: WBCTrader post# 24741

Wednesday, 02/20/2019 3:47:04 PM

Wednesday, February 20, 2019 3:47:04 PM

Post# of 32923
Obviously it was mentioned in the "get current" filings. Kinda the reason for the motivation in filing don't you think?

In the course of preparing this opinion, counsel has reviewed the following documents relating to the Company, all of which appear to comply as to form with the OTC Pink Basic Disclosure Guidelines, (together with the date they were posted through the OTC Disclosure and News Service, if applicable):

• Current filings with the Nevada Secretary of State as of December 14, 2018. Note that, according to Nevada Secretary of State website information, Kali, Inc. was incorporated on October 30, 2006;
• The Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and By Laws, both published on www.OTCMarkets.com as of March 31, 2016 and dated February 2016, according to filings;
• Annual Report (Year Ended December 31, 2017; posted to OTC Markets Disclosures).
• Quarterly Report (Quarter Ended March 31, 2018; posted on OTC Markets Disclosures)
• Quarterly Report (Quarter Ended June 30, 2018; posted to OTC Markets Disclosures).
• Quarterly Report (Quarter Ended September 31, 2018; posted to OTC Markets Disclosures).
• The NCM Biotech Acquisition Agreement and related documents. • Other related corporate information as were necessary and provided by the corporation's management for the purposes of this letter.


Pretty much sums it up for me in conjunction with the Goldman Report.
What exactly is your opinion on why you think they are not current?
Is it only the difference of the authorized shares number?