Am I the only one who feels PWC failed in their
fiduciary duty, to keep the public properly informed.
On July 18, '18, PWC leaked, intentionally or mistakenly,
in the 3rd Report, that there were two QB's. The public then assumed that there were 2 companies posed to make qualified bids; that is, until
the public was blindsided by the Eno letter of July 31, '18, that
there were in fact no qb's made, and the co. would be proceeding
to liquidation. The public only found out,
in the 4th Report, that the qb's withdrew from the process, so
there were in fact NO qb's after all. PWC, which knew they had
erred in leaking the qb's, and which knew that some of the
investing public could've been relying on that fact, should have
made a public statement to the fact as those qb's were withdrawn
from the process. So the investing public should have been fore-
warned so they could have adjusted their expectations. Everyone who lost
big when the stock went from .07+ to .01+ should be entitled to compensation
from PWC!
