Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ)

[rrao11]

Agreed! IMO Drs won’t be signing up and/or conducting these procedures without seeing clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy. So, I feel very confident about the clinical trial results. Now, is it 80% effective ? Or higher ? Or lower? - need to wait for the peer review to be published.

I also am under the impression that the Caverstem 2.0 procedure and needle/tools used are patented and that the patents are owned by CMTH ie. proprietary tools and techniques of CMTH. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks

L&S

Ps. Lots of noise on ‘Rumors, Murmurs & buzz’. - for what it’s worth.