InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 371
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2008

Re: justthefactsmam post# 26214

Saturday, 02/16/2019 3:51:09 PM

Saturday, February 16, 2019 3:51:09 PM

Post# of 37346
I just did, thanks for pointing this out. Very well written.

For them to claim the NOLs, they need to prove continuity of interest under section 368(a)(1)(G).

Taken from here (page 3):
https://www.sullcrom.com/siteFiles/Publications/SC_Publication_Corporate_Reorganizations.pdf

In the legislative history to that statute, Congress stated its expectation that the courts and the Treasury Department would determine whether the continuity of interest requirement is satisfied in a potential reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(G) by treating as proprietors the most senior class of creditors who received stock, together with all interests equal and junior to them, including shareholders. See S. Rep. No. 1035, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 36-37 (1980).

I read this as the shareholders of OldCo needing to own a piece of the acquiring company (Transform HoldCo) for the NOLs to be used. This could be scenario 1, and if it fails then my suggested scenario could be in play as a backup plan.

What's your view ?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.