InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,178.40
(
-0.15%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.83
(
0.96%
)
Bitcoin
61,204.48
(
-3.06%
)
Post# of 37346
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (5) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (5) Next 10 Prev Next

justthefactsmam

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 12
Posts 1297
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/02/2009

justthefactsmam

Re: None

Sunday, 02/10/2019 9:59:40 AM

Sunday, February 10, 2019 9:59:40 AM

Post# of 37346
linda,

look at page 16/83 of judge drain's order:

section r: satisfaction of section 363(f) standards and then look at the attached link to an article about F reorganizations.

the apa provide the various Transactions to be treated as 1 or more reorganizations under section 368 of the Code.

what are your thoughts?

https://www.taxlawforchb.com/2015/10/sometimes-an-f-is-a-good-result/
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (5) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (5) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up