BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[Joefyffe]

Did the pwc purposely use vague verbiage once again in a report to avoid being specific on certain subjects, in this case, the future status of the shares, like they have on several other entries on previous reports? Their verbiage reminds me of the shadiness of a LOI (Letter of intent). You know, the use of words in a PR that aren't legally binding in the event that a company's "intent" to do whatever, didn't follow through, especially when there was really no "intent" to truly follow through. The company doesn't even have to come back and address the LOI when it just fades away in to the abyss. The true "intent" of a LOI is just an attempt to create a buying frenzy to sell shares!!

Maybe it is pwc's "intent" to create a fire sale on Monday to the benefit of others. What a HUGE opportunity Monday will be to buy cheap shares. Then when the shares don't get cancelled because they are part of another Confidential or "hidden" deal, they won't legally have to answer to anyone, because they said "does not anticipate" "does not believe" blah blah blah. Otherwise, why would they not have simply stated, "The BIOA shares are not part of this deal and will be handled in the US bankruptcy court for the bankruptcy portion after completion of the CCAA court has finalized it's oversight of the the asset sell portion of the company". It's all about the use of words and verbiage!!!