InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,401.78
(
0.24%
)
Post# of 145141
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

BeetBroker

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 8
Posts 571
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/05/2017

BeetBroker

Re: trader59 post# 59921

Friday, 02/08/2019 10:30:29 PM

Friday, February 08, 2019 10:30:29 PM

Post# of 145141
Why would PWC claim they don’t have the power/responsibility to cancel the shares via finra and now suddenly try to say they did (we don’t even know what finra was told)?

Why would finra be told shares are cancelled if they still have BioAmber Inc. matters to resolve? They wouldn’t.

Did it say shares were cancelled in that report? Wouldn’t be confidential anymore at this point if that’s what finra was told and they could make that the new banner on their bioamber page. It would match the warning in the info box perfectly.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up