InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2017

Re: A deleted message

Friday, 02/08/2019 2:17:13 PM

Friday, February 08, 2019 2:17:13 PM

Post# of 232961
I've heard a few times today that building out the company's own infrastructure in lieu of taking a bad deal from BP would be "expensive" to the point of not being feasible, or simply "disastrous". Nobody seems to want to tackle why it's so impossible though. Care to enlighten me? I'm legitimately curious.

I'm also not advocating that this be the company's first choice, but as someone said the other day (paraphrasing): necessity never made a good deal.

So again, would you or anyone else care to convince me that the company should take a bad deal, that rewards BP for doing nothing other than existing, instead of exploring the option of building real negotiating leverage by slowing R&D on indications not near-revenue and using the excess capital available to build out their own sales and distribution network?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News