InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5217
Posts 24019
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: stervc post# 1969

Sunday, 02/03/2019 10:52:07 AM

Sunday, February 03, 2019 10:52:07 AM

Post# of 163961
Important regarding any "potential" VYST Reverse Split...

I posted about this a little while back, but I think it needs to be addressed now. They are going to try to get to the NASDAQ without having to ever do a reverse split. Much of that depends on a few variables such as... how many shares they buyback... how many shares they are going to be able to buyback before the price really starts to get away from them... etc.

I'm sure they have more than one plan intact to allow for flexibility.

I was informed by the company that the only way that VYST would do a reverse split would be if they needed to do a small no higher than a 1-10 to meet NASDAQ requirements of having a $4.00 minimum bid for 30 consecutive trading days. Anyone that's spooked about a 1-10 ratio to get to the NASDAQ, respectfully, has no experience about market logic and sound reasoning. I'll take that any day all day with any stock that I am in and have ever been in if such a situation presented itself as it does here with VYST.

Again, I was also informed that "IF" such is the case, VYST would announce a no higher than a 1-10 reverse split at the same time of announcing their application submission to trade on the NASDAQ and would do so when the price is at .50 per share. The company told me that they would make sure that the NASDAQ submission would be filed for investors to confirm because they would not want investors to think that they would be executing any reverse split for the negative norms that exists with stocks that have done reverse splits before in the market. They are very aware of this. I was told that if they never submit their application to the NASDAQ, they will never do a reverse split. This is how confident they are about getting to the NASDAQ.

Here's a good example of a stock that I was in that had done a small ratio reverse split. Look at what happened with INTV as a better stock to "compare and contrast" how a stock with substance reacts after doing a small ratio reverse split. INTV had done a small 1-50 reverse split. The pre-split price was .001 and the post-split price was .05 per share. Later after their small 1-50 reverse split, INTV ran from .05 to $6.74 per share.

Here on Nov 27, 2017, I created a valuation post stating that INTV would be worth $5.42 per share:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=136448710

Later on Dec 18, 2017, INTV ran to $6.74 per share with 4,884,032 shares in volume for that day:
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/integrated-ventures-inc-INTV/historical/more-historical-data

I will tell you, no offense to INTV, but VYST has far more going on than INTV since the acquisition coming into VYST is going to bring over $35 Million in Revenues and is very profitable. I remember back during the INTV days, I was really trying to tell investors to fully understand the magnitude of what was transpiring and to "not" stereotype INTV with its low ratio reverse split to be of the norm with those other stocks that had done the high ratio reverse splits. Heck, since I'm more wrong than being right within this tough market, some ignored my thoughts then and I truly understood why. I will say that the situation here with VYST is far better and what's happening here should not be ignored. I really think all should really dig in and research the growth that is transpiring here with VYST.

v/r
Sterling

Exit Strategy & Etiquette Thoughts for a Stock
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128822531
I never give investing advice; only my beliefs for risks in a stock.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VYST News