InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1427
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2016

Re: cysonic post# 38352

Friday, 01/25/2019 7:27:50 AM

Friday, January 25, 2019 7:27:50 AM

Post# of 38634
Cysonic, Interesting thought that IPCI would want Purdue Pharma tech added. I am not sure why. If Purdue themselves did not feel they had any claim over the original patents, why would IPCI ? If Purdue felt they had any claim over the patents they would have tried to add them in the first place. I will admit without having first hand knowledge I can't be sure one way or the other. So you could be right.

The reason I said this is bad is because the case was set for trial, until IPCI requested the stay. by adding another plaintiff this late it allows for numerous delays. because now the new Plaintiff would be afforded the same discovery and options to depose witnesses. In theory it could stall the case for another year.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y