InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 113
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/15/2017

Re: nyt post# 73247

Monday, 01/21/2019 12:35:47 PM

Monday, January 21, 2019 12:35:47 PM

Post# of 134151
Sorry, I really didn't intend to annoy you with statements that go against your beliefs. I only cited examples of devices that I personally have experience with that do work. I also can cite examples of many that don't work. But I didn't make ASSumptions and generalizations. I spent my own money and time to find out.

I used to be skeptical, but the eye opener to me was a friend who built an exhaust vortex device that captured un-burned hydrocarbons and heat and sent them through a gasoline evaporator back for combustion. My participation with him was a failed effort to get his device tested by the DOE. Just after he got an appointment to drive his demo car to D.C., he received a threatening visit at his home. Similar things happened to Charles Pogue (the 100 mpg carburator) after the war, Paul Pantone (GEET processor), Stanley Meyers (the first 100% HHO water car), and others. These inventors got U.S. patents that if commercialized would have threatened the oil industry. Some of their histories are published.

There are similar invention histories related to the Electrical and Medical industries.

One of my inventions is a hot and cold therapy pad material that is much longer lasting, safer and more effective than traditional devices. My partner and I made a deal with a major therapy device producer. We thought we had a committed customer when we signed for an exclusive while they tested our device. After many samples and a year of testing feedback that the pads did in fact do everything as well as we claimed, they stalled us for 2 more years, wearing out our financial resources. Finally after they were bought out, our former contact there admitted to us that they really only wanted to keep our invention off the market because they were invested in what was already successful for them.

INDUSTRIES (INCLUDING APPLE) OFTEN DON'T WANT TO ADVANCE FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS, MOSTLY RELATED TO MONEY AND TRADITION. (CHECK OUT THE HISTORY OF WATT AND APPL). They are not lined up eagerly waiting for the next revolutionary invention to come along. Even if such a device is internal to a company, management doesn't just "snatch it up" as you seem to think.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News