InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 4351
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/07/2016

Re: None

Saturday, 01/19/2019 11:35:30 AM

Saturday, January 19, 2019 11:35:30 AM

Post# of 52605
IMO, reverse split first, probably 750 to 1, then look for a reverse merger candidate about a month after the reverse takes effect and the stock settles down again. Any reverse merger into a stock selling at $0.0001 will be approximately 98 to 1 creating billions and billions of new shares and a need to create a new capitalization and perhaps a 1000 to 1 reverse. A merger of this type would render the merge-in candidate valueless and not what an enterprising merge-in company would expect from "going public." If the stock settles down and is selling for lets say 50% of the post reversal price, $.03 to $.04, a much more standard 90 to 1 merger could take place, and a much smaller second reverse simultaneous to the merge-in of about 7 or 8 to 1 would occur.

All of this talk above would be based on what a reverse merger candidate would be looking for, but it would totally crush existing shareholders. But then what do existing shareholders have to look forward to now? The go forward now is another pump and dump when CEO Doug needs some pocket change to pay lawyers and auditors. He creates a new group of bag holders one or twice a year. But that is the lot of sub-penny stock traders.

But then again CEO Doug is a scumbag and none of this would happen or it already would have. But yet again Doug did have such an offer in 2016 and 2017 and accepted the offer and then sabotaged it.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent APYP News