Does this response from Stan sound like a “never do well” or someone who has a plan and knows what he hopes to do. There are always risk with such projects but he had rescued others and this investor has called on him yet again. There is a lot of understandable anger on this forum but reason may still win the day for shareholders. I don’t think Bradford Investors have much hope, and that is where the severe anger resides.
Some of what people say Stan should be doing is being done (read his response) or is planned when the time is right. People on here don’t know the whole story and the Bradford folks don’t care and some take a scorched earth approach. If SEC agrees with them, then we shareholders will be in as bad a shape as Bradford folks. If SEC says, let’s smack them but not crush them, and let’s go hard after perpetrators of Bradford screw up individually, then there is hope for us. “Hold on tight, a little longer”.
