edited: midas, breezy, et al - it is Sabby doing their work
our little theory is they got involved before the last news in a more holistic financing manner.
Brought the stock price up with the news, it needs some strong initial and sustaining buying to do that, which failed w/ Coeptis partnership news.
Then they short at their will on the top, which is easy to know, b/c they simply stop supporting the move up.
Then the pre-negotiated offering which they also buy a chunk of it, the Warrants as a hedge.
Then they terrorize the chart at their will, maybe 'just' back to square one or maybe higher/lower - whenever they are done and showing no position.
Last year it took a very long time until they completed their mission: $3 -> $0.60 or so.
First we thought 'no position' in their 13-F filing signaled completion - we were all wrong, since their sub 'volatility fund' was not included.
The rest is history.
Interesting to know, they sued MBOT months earlier for not being able to have delivered enough shares (probably for their short strategy or covering). Don't know how that ended.
(copy will go to blog)
EDIT: So, whenever Sabby is out and good sentiment returns is – stock can recover. They surely don’t do this for just one week or little gains.
IMHO best to have stock crash hard and fast with volume, so they are satisfied and its done quickly.
GL
