Wednesday, January 16, 2019 12:21:15 PM
Now you have ARYC claiming the same thing with one big difference. They have technical proof provided by users of considerable stature--FDA, VA,etc, that conducted year long tests and gave them a 100% accuracy rating. That is hard to believe getting 100% accuracy. These are reputable branches of the US Government and no interconnection between these organizations. There would be severe penalties to any misrepresentation by these organizations.
The fact that 3 different government organizations published their results with 100% accuracy is stunning and a remarkable achievement by Mark and his technical staff.
In all industries it is tough to fabricate devices that will achieve
those results on items of less impact on human life. Auto.Aircraft,electronics etc.
ARYC has done this on devices that will be used to determine life saving information on the human body. Paying $30 Billion for a company that can produce that is the best bargain ever offered in the medical field. This only my thoughts and I welcome arguments to the contrary,
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM