Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ)

[uvaphd]

In the absence of definitive information, engaged investors will naturally speculate about the nuts and bolts of their holdings.

As I suggested almost 6 months ago, it is tempting to wonder whether leadership WANTS the PPS to remain in this range for strategic reasons. If, for example, they aim to use shares as a part of the recruitment and/or contracting with prospective doctors, it would be in their interest to maintain the PPS within a certain (and low) range: the higher the PPS, the FEWER shares would be available for this purpose.

In addition, although I cannot quote the SEC regulations, my vague understanding is that only those shareholders (in this scenario on-boarding physicians) who hold more than a certain % of the company’s shares need to disclose those holding publicly by way of formal filings. Keep the number below that, and the whole thing could fly under the radar.

In the end, if anything like what I am theorizing here is taking place, it might explain why so little has been done to increase the PPS (when it’s almost certain that it could be based on all that MUST be going on), while also making sense of the almost complete absence of DETAILS about doctor recruitment strategies, affiliate compensation, sources of cash flow, and other related factors.