Thursday, January 10, 2019 1:15:24 AM
Applicant’s goods are “Electrolyte-enhanced drinking water; Drinking water.” Both registrants’ goods are “Bottled drinking water.” These goods are related.
Conclusion
Given that the applied-for mark is confusingly similar to the registrants’ marks in sound and appearance and that applicant’s goods are related to registrants’ goods, applicant is rightly refused registration under Section 2(d) for a likelihood of confusion.
Were you scammed by a shady Pink CEO?
Take Action Here: https://acadia.sec.gov/TcrWeb/faces/pages/disclaimer.jspx?_afrLoop=1427429225701845&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=1ax5qi5dy4_1#!%40%40%3F_afrWindowId%3D1ax5qi5dy4_1%26_afrLoop%3D1427429225701845%26_
FEATURED North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. and All-In-Extracts Announce Joint Venture to Develop and Release New Testosterone Boosting Supplement • BLEG • Aug 5, 2024 8:30 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Strategic Initiatives and Corporate Direction Changes • KGKG • Aug 2, 2024 2:00 PM
POET and Luxshare Tech Expand Product Offerings for Artificial Intelligence Networks • POET • Aug 1, 2024 9:28 AM
Management Discusses Financial Filings of Global Arena Holding Inc., for 10-K 2023 and 10-Q, 1st Quarter 2024 • GAHC • Aug 1, 2024 9:14 AM
VAYK Announces LOI to Acquire $1 Million Home Service Company to Support Airbnb Business • VAYK • Aug 1, 2024 9:00 AM