Yeah, it's like an uncharacteristic spasm of honesty occurred. It's unlikely that a Cyclone engine has ever produced supercritical steam, but if one did, it would have been just before a catastrophic hardware failure.
Given the other typos in that Cyclone nonsense, however, it's more likely another mistake by Frankie, who just doesn't have a clue about the technology of the small company she's been President of for 14 years or so. Remember the video she narrated? She seemed very proud of their "dyno-meter".
As you've said before, how can people claiming to be professionals be so immune to proofreading the stuff they put out?
"Oh, but Tesla got $500 million to hire proofreaders!", she'll be shrieking as she reads this.
It's also interesting that their "investor" was displaying an old artistic impression drawing of the original Mark 5 engine. Not the Mark 10 they were supposed to be funding, or even the later version of the Mark 5 with all the Harry Schoell inventions removed. No pictures of any real, physical Cyclone hardware at all.
It makes you wonder if that whole venture was done by email and if the guy in Utah even visited Cyclone and asked for a demonstration.
It's safe to say the 1500 hp Mark 10 exists only as a cocktail napkin sketch and a figment of Harry Schoell's imagination. Cyclone could always publish photos and videos of these engines to prove me wrong, but they won't. There's nothing real to photograph.
I wonder if they'll continue the Cyclone scam as a solar energy venture, or whether they'll use some other con to swindle new investors.
