InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 129
Posts 22931
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2016

Re: Stockfun1 post# 65080

Friday, 12/28/2018 8:54:50 AM

Friday, December 28, 2018 8:54:50 AM

Post# of 94913
Stockfun1, you mean SA-Gov't needs-MORE GREASING to-'accept' giving the Provisional licence without continuing to request to COMPLETELY OUT FIT the entire operation to fully functioning capacity?

That's my understanding of your post because you basically say that what SA Gov't is asking is ILLEGAL per their own wording of the Provisional licence application?

Let's say it costs $500K to COMPLETELY OUT FIT the entire operation and COMPLY with Gov't request... then if TXTM GREASES Griffith Molewa with, let's say, $200K, then TXTM 'saves' $300K, right?

It's not even SUBTLE?



What are your thoughts about this?