InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 7237
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2014

Re: Werbe post# 725

Thursday, 12/20/2018 4:42:35 PM

Thursday, December 20, 2018 4:42:35 PM

Post# of 837

I am going by Waybackmachine and I see same info on site I linked as from March and July and up until October of this year.

I don't remember the exact date the website disappeared -- I noticed it in July but the ticker died in March when they assigned all assets to the lawyer and told him to LIQUIDATE. They left one framework outline page on the Aeolus URL but if you clicked on any link, you got a 404 Not Found. That's what "the website is gone" means. There was a dummy page still up in the root, but the web SITE was gone.

click on one of the hotlinks on that dummy Aeolus web page you found in your waybackmachine from March to October -- you'll see what I mean.

PR shows they went outside of court system. That would be called BANKRUPTCY?

Bankruptcies go through the court system -- Filing for BK means filing for Chapter 7 or 11 or 13 protection. Aeolus did not file for bankruptcy -- they simply made an agreement with the creditors -- the cheapest possible way to end it. Aeolus threw in the towel and had an attorney LIQUIDATE all assets.

There are no assets left over. The lawyer didn't keep some and liquidate some. the lawyer LIQUIDATED ALL ASSETS. There is nothing to spin off.

The IP has value I assume (haven't looked at patent expiration dates in awhile) but the buyer of the IP doesn't want the AOLS ticker -- it's not an asset because it has BAGGAGE in the form of stock owned by someone else. If they go public, they will get a new shell. A ticker with issued stock owned by someone else is not an asset -- it's a liability.

Nobody is "putting anything into this ticker." So you see that it's not ME that's putting up false information.

I would like to know who owns the patents now to see if they try to develop something, but that doesn't mean anything to AOLS shareholders because they got left behind. They are holding a bag of nothing.

Am I understood better now? If not, oh well, that's not my problem.