I am agreeing they can and should make a dividend. But they will not , is my sense. As a person who built a business from the ground I think the same , which means nothing matters until the companies long range financial needs are secured.
The idea of the dividend policy was to prevent a lawsuit when the forum was heating up.
While there are many reasons for us all as shareholders to be very dissatisfied I have very high confidence that a lawsuit will only made the stock and the company and our outcome even worse.
and I believe it was Garrett's idea's as well who suggested this fake dividend policy. That's why it just came out of nowhere, and we were all convinced that Garrett had something to do with it, but It was not intended to deliver on the first place. I've been skeptical about it since they released it.
Garrett is not on the same boat as the shareholders, he has several options to get his money back with interest, but for the shareholders, it's a different story.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.