“McClusky has 40 years of experience dealing with Mergers and Acquisitions. Siegel Endorsed him- I have proof of that. Just in case he takes it down.”
You’re exactly right, T. There are many coincidences regarding the connection between McCluskey and Siegel. I took a screenshot of Siegel’s endorsement for Gene in one of my posts back in August.
People say they’ve called Gene and he’s told them many times he’s got nothing to do with ECOS... despite the fact that one of Gene’s clients “stole” the Illinois ECOS name. I say “stole” because Gene knows of Siegel (he even told people this), yet he took the name of one of Siegel’s business entities anyways - Ecolocap Solutions Inc.. Why would Gene want to deal with the legal repercussions of fighting Siegel’s company for the ECOS name? Especially when he could’ve simply suggested a different name and avoided this whole situation altogether? Seems very odd to me.
Now, nobody can prove that there truly is something going on between Gene and ECOS. But then again, nobody can disprove it either. The reason why is because it would be insider information if Gene said anything about the connection, without ECOS first making it public. Gene knows this, and he wouldn’t risk breaking the law just to tell people there is a connection.
