Supurva Healthcare Group Inc (SPRV)

[LoanRangerTX]

The Case isn't dismissed and thats a fact.

The relief they were seeking in the document was against the court order to produce drivers records per your Post:

The dispute is whether TForce must produce documents related to any drivers it may have

23 directly hired to deliver packages for Google Express, as opposed to only those drivers that were

24 hired by On Courier, which TForce contends it engaged as an “independent service provider.”

25 The challenged order requires TForce to produce responsive documents both as to drivers hired

26 through On Courier and as to any drivers TForce may have directly hired for the Google Express

27 service.

The "order to deny relief" is as follows:

A district court may modify a magistrate judge’s ruling on a non-dispositive matter only if

16 the order is “clearly erroneous” or “contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P.

17 72(a); Bahn v. NME Hospitals, Inc., 929 F.2d 1404, 1414 (9th Cir. 1991). Because TForce has

18 shown no such error here, its objections to the order are overruled.

So by reading the last line "shown no such error here, its objections to the order are overruled." it shows that the document is a rejection of TForce's argument.

If the case was "dismissed" there wouldn't be additional court documents being filed. Additionally, when opening pacer and searching for the court case it would show that the case was closed and no longer active. Its currently active.

Lastly, "Denying relief" doesn't mean that T-Force or OnCouirer doesn't have to pay. It means that the objection to produce evidence during discovery was ruled out and that they have to produce those files.

Legally: Relief means any order or judgement to the benefit of one of the partis in the lawsuit.