InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2018

Re: newztanz post# 39402

Sunday, 12/16/2018 9:40:27 AM

Sunday, December 16, 2018 9:40:27 AM

Post# of 52224
Rural population is only 19.7% of the overall populous. I would guess people in these areas have the lowest ticket cost. And I will assume an equal ppercentage of population have the highest ticket prices. Leaving the median of the population 60.6% Being that 80.3% of the poulation lives in urban settings, I believe that this group will be charged an amount above the median cost range of the MP subscription. Sure urban will be charged the most and rural will be charged the least but the mass will bare a cost above the median to render the most incoming money for MP to use to average the expense. This service is an insurtech when it is all said and done. The "policy" to cover cost of attendance "claims" will have to be adequate enough to cover an overall usage ratio of above 2.3 in my opinion . I still feel MP monthly fees fall short of this. But with their current sub count being around 1M I'm guessing their short term goal is to achieve 1 good quarter so they can simple pogo stick back into NASDAQ compliance. As time goes by they will start losing money again and have to crutch back onto shareholders. Perhaps by that time a new set of investors with a higher pps to support the continued losses.

Don't listen to me.
I'm not rich.
I'm wrong a lot of the time.
I don't even trust myself.