td...I don't believe you are capable of dealing in "facts", but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for purposes of discussion. I'm interested in your opinion on these events:
1) What would you say the reaction will be from the investment community when DNAP shows $8M in cash on their Balance Sheet?
2) What will be the reaction from the investment community when the three (3) NIH applications that Senecio is working on for DNAPrint become public knowledge?
3) What will be the reaction from the investment community when the underlying details of the DNA Phenomics relationship become known?
4) What will be the reaction from the investment community when we learn the details of Phase II of the recent NIJ sub-contract?
5) What will be the reaction from the investment community when DNAPrint announces which pharmaceutical companies will be using them to generate clinical trial data?
6) What will be the reaction from the investment community when DNAPrint announces the forensics partners that Dr. Frudakis mentioned in the TWST article that will help DNAP expand their forensics market?
The problem with your "facts" TD is that they are not facts at all. They are primarily opinion and innuendo, based on the underlying premise that DNAP is some type of scam company whose sole intent is to generate shares so as to steal money from their investors. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Every one of the six events I listed is in process. Every one of those six events would "prop" up the PPS. The only way I can accept your scenario would be to ignore them all.
Others can do what they will, I see money in the bank and more on the way. I've got the next six months to change my decision, but right now I don't think that will be necessary.
Later,
W2P
