InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 93
Posts 8868
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2014

Re: eqinvestor post# 295067

Monday, 12/10/2018 10:26:55 AM

Monday, December 10, 2018 10:26:55 AM

Post# of 298910
Special Interrogatory No. 19 DENIED

This interrogatory reads: “Identify all Mycheck employees who have met Matthew Hansen in the years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.” In the cross-complaint, Maciora alleges that Matthew Hansen is one of Starr’s alter egos. (X-Compl., ¶ 24.) Maciora further alleges that Starr used the Hansen identity to commingle MEC’s funds with those of another cross-defendant. (See id., ¶ 41.) That being said, the first set of special interrogatories defines “Matthew Hansen” as an individual whose name is spelled nine different ways. MEC objects that this definition renders the interrogatory is vague and ambiguous, and the objections are sustained. Maciora offered to redefine the interrogatory, but MEC was only required to respond to the interrogatory actually served. No further response is required.

The above is an example of Maciora's ineptitude and desperation to find anything to justify his negative actions towards MEC and its shareholders.

Making stuff up is just not cool.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.