"You obviously have a great fear of what I post."
Actually, your statement is a prime example of how off beat, irrational and absurd your speculations really are. How in the world did you come up with that conclusion? Please explain your thought process and how you concluded that? As stated before, the only reason I respond and refute what you post is because I don't want new uninformed potential investors to be mislead by your speculative posts.
"I post as many facts as I can and using those facts to make some sense of what is going on."
THE PROBLEM IS THAT YOU DON'T DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN WHAT IS FACT AND WHAT IS SPECULATION. That is the only problem I have with you! Do you get it now?
"You posted one interview with Moro and the rest of your stuff is garbage designed to mentally protect yourself in justifying your speculative investing."
I suppose the garbage part are my responses, refuting, challenging and questioning your many speculations, that I know are way off base, in part because I have factual info to contradict what you "think"!
And if what I post is garbage, HOW WOULD YOU CLASSIFY YOUR POSTS(?), and please don't insult the board by saying, intelligent, well thought out and informative posts of reason. That would be the biggest comedic one liner of the year!
