InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2005

Re: None

Saturday, 11/04/2006 10:58:29 AM

Saturday, November 04, 2006 10:58:29 AM

Post# of 19309
Merrimack RA Phase II (from ClinicalTrials.gov)

I was looking back on the details of the study (listed as 'no longer recruiting', http://tinyurl.com/y7lrz6 ). It was a reasonably large Phase II study (260 patients) performed in almost 40 centers. The study monitored patients on one of 3 doses (2.5, 7.5 and 20 Mg) of MM-093, and did not include a placebo arm. I know this is wild, biased speculation - but I think there is some non-negligible probability that they could demonstrate clear efficacy in such a study. While a placebo arm was not included, patients were required to be on a stable regime of methotrexate and folate (so before and after comparisons are possible). Looking back, I found a reference ( http://tinyurl.com/yxlhzn ; Motley Fool) describing Amgen's intention (based on FDA guidance) to submit their application for IL-1ra (Kineret) following phase II studies of RA patients. Does anyone remember (before I dig too much further) - did they indeed submit after phase II? The Motley Fool referenced their intention to do so in Q2 1999, but I didn't think Kineret was approved until late 2001 (am I wrong on that?).

As an aside - does anyone know the half-life of MM-093 in serum and the proposed dosing frequency? If you do know a number, please indicate if the half-life is for a native AFP isoform or MM-093. I haven't searched the literature yet, but I found a reference in the clinicaltrial.gov summary that one of the exclusion criteria was women planning to become pregnant within 4 weeks after the last study dose.

Thanks for your help.
VH


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.