InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Re: erthang post# 6198

Friday, 11/03/2006 11:59:26 PM

Friday, November 03, 2006 11:59:26 PM

Post# of 30387
Date Open High Low Close Volume Change Change %
11/3/2006 0.99 0.99 0.83 0.85 646,030 0.13
-13.27%
11/2/2006 0.92 1.07 0.9 0.98 2,049,133 0.12
13.95%
11/1/2006 0.895 0.9 0.84 0.86 646,923 0.02
2.38%
10/31/2006 0.83 0.84 0.77 0.84 367,133 0.10
13.51%
10/30/2006 0.84 0.84 0.74 0.74 97,917 0.03
-3.90%
10/27/2006 0.82 0.82 0.755 0.77 238,337 0.01
-1.28%
10/26/2006 0.8 0.82 0.75 0.78 489,697 0.03
4.00%
10/25/2006 0.745 0.8 0.69 0.75 254,486 0.07
10.29%
Total 4,789,656

Looking only at the period involved in all the media hype, the stock has traded 4.7 million shares and gained 10 cents. It had not stabilized Friday so we have no idea what Monday has in store. If management was not selling and had visions of an exclusive or other licensing deals as Erthang imagines, why didn't they just tell the seller to wait and not stoop to manipulating the stock so the seller could dump shares. Acting in that manner would tend to make any sane investor conclude that other licensing deals, money infusion or exclusives are not close at all. If management and insiders joined in the sale, you could easily conclude that the Abbott deal itself may be in jeopardy. We will find out about that if filings are made.

I cannot make any comment other than this was one horrible period in the history of Biocurex.
IMO, there is going to be a lot of angry investors that purchased this stock on hype and when they discover that is all it was, the SEC is going to get complaints, lots of them.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.