InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1511
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/28/2011

Re: rollem777 post# 11394

Tuesday, 11/27/2018 10:47:42 PM

Tuesday, November 27, 2018 10:47:42 PM

Post# of 12368
Good find rollem..........however......

1. Forum is a British company. I believe that even after pxp took control of forums majority it is still a British company unless pxp converted them to something else and I missed it. So we would need international law here. Not USA laws of statute of limitations.

If the limitation is in fact also 5 years by British law then we should move fast and at least open a docket or procedure as to not miss a key window date for filing. I believe if we go back 5 years we are still looking somewhere between 12% and 18%. I don't remember. Fine, it's not the 30% when Edward entered, but it's still twice as much equity as we have now and that is huuuuuige. If they assess damages too with additional award in cash or further equity it will make me drool.
So I ask you since you have stated now is not the time to proceed there, but diligently find modern laws that might reflect forums own statute of limitations.. what do you suggest we do now?

I would say we use or newly formed group to persuade the govt to open a case of action against pxp for self dealing to be followed immediately with a civil suit before any possible expiration of a limitation. Any thoughts out there anybody?

This is the way to send a clear message to pxp to come to the table immediately to save face.

Also you stated that the 10 cents is reflective on pxp's own forum valuation. Or the dennison deal for pxp shares. It should be one clear cut example and stick with it. The 10 cent figure would be obsolete as share prices fluctuate daily. If it's the done deal by dennison it should have an expiration time frame on it as certain events increase forums true value. I just want clarity so we don't end up retracting our own statements as a group. Thank you Broooooo. Much respect