Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:46:43 PM
1 - no one in management or on the board has previously successfully developed and launched a medical device; Norchi was a mutual fund manager & stock analyst - and apparently on the beach - before taking this job
2 - wound dressing sector is very crowded, price sensitive, and needs strong distribution and careful product positioning for success. AC5 doesn't seem to fit bill. and ARTH is not positioned for success with regard to solid marketing/distribution organization and budget and, which would consume working capital
3- management and board compensation is unacceptably high for this company, which is always a red flag.
4 - key asset is a MIT patent that is long in the tooth; registered in many countries, but still only one parent patent. Also, MIT reports indicate that AC5 technology is appropriate for a tissue sealant, but is not a true hemostat. Without the MIT connection, would we be talking about ARTH? Entity was previously an on-line distributor of automative parts.
What am I missing on the positive side? Please point these out.
FEATURED DaBaby and Stunna 4 Vegas's "NO DRIBBLE" Joins Music Licensing, Inc.'s Portfolio • Jun 7, 2024 10:15 AM
Mushrooms Inc. (OTC: MSRM) Announces Significant Share Buy Back by the Board Director and New Strategic Initiatives. • MSRM • Jun 5, 2024 1:32 PM
Hydromer Announces Launch of HydroThrombX Medical Device Coating Technology • HYDI • Jun 5, 2024 10:24 AM
Dr. Michael Dent Finances $1 Million to Drive HealthLynked's Healthcare Transformation • HLYK • Jun 5, 2024 8:00 AM
Avant Technologies Enters Binding LOI to Purchase Dozens of High-Performance, Immersible, AI-Powered Servers • AVAI • Jun 5, 2024 8:00 AM
IQST - iQSTEL Announces $290 Million 2024 Annual Revenue Forecast • IQST • Jun 4, 2024 1:43 PM