InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1354
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2017

Re: None

Saturday, 11/17/2018 12:38:15 PM

Saturday, November 17, 2018 12:38:15 PM

Post# of 10465
Why do people fail to mention that all the old executives that were “dismissed” last year and all their shares vested immediately, the ones that Isaac had to pay them for all his wrong doings lmfao. Why do all these previous executives still have the vast majority of their shares? Especially after the price spiked to over a dollar shortly after they were “dismissed”? Wouldn’t they have sold out with all the turmoil and lack of confidence in the company? Or they just holding this stuff until it goes down to .0001?

Can anyone explain this? With a logical response? Something that makes sense. Not a response with links saved from your notes in your phone and introducing names like O’Rourke, Leighton, Honig, etc.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent GWAV News