Friday, November 16, 2018 6:24:02 AM
You are assuming that Clayton is not involved in the scam or that Bland has no continuing leverage over him. And yet all facts point in the other direction.
Why no new lawyer? Why no clarification in PR? Why did Sixty-Six give away their company? Why no transparency on the audit problem that Clayton himself agreed would prevent this from being audited (he agreed when he signed the LOI)? Why does there seem to be a raft of back-channel communications that benefit some at the expense of others?
Yes, we have the heartfelt testimony of Clayton' dad. Is that enough?
I am obviously NOT an investment advisor.
Recent SSOF News
- Form C-AR - Annual Report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/16/2024 06:35:25 PM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM