InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2040
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/19/2018

Re: darkinvestor post# 35549

Thursday, 11/15/2018 9:35:22 AM

Thursday, November 15, 2018 9:35:22 AM

Post# of 70496
I do see that but this was via a 3a10 based on a contractual debt from a corporate acquisition 3 years ago. The company knew the debt was owed and "arranged" to have it settled the end of last year. Why? Why not the year before or the year before that? Why not the end of this year? Doing it last year gave them this entire year to stabilize the price down or at lower price. Why? It has been my experience that very rarely are things coincidental or simply just by accident when it comes to companies whos sole purpose is to earn profit and become more valuable. This company is more sophisticated than I think they try to lead on. From their accounting tactics that down play revenues or progress, to consistent delays in meeting goals which seem coordinated, to the small social media insights that shows us they are further along than they say (no where in their financials does it show the purchase or inventory on a manufacturing facility yet they clearly own sophisticated equipment), to keep access to "cash" off books for when they need it and then of course there are the Chairman/CEO's letters. The man at the helm is not stupid as some here have suggested. That is obvious in not only the way he writes but the level of vocabulary and understanding of the public markets he clearly has. It just seems very intentional and like they are intentionally holding back. I have seen companies hold back but never like this to this extent. Its almost as if they want the company to look undesirable in some ways or just barely desirable. What could possibly be the reason for that?