InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 4106
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/05/2018

Re: kthomp19 post# 481270

Thursday, 11/15/2018 7:10:06 AM

Thursday, November 15, 2018 7:10:06 AM

Post# of 800476
Please read what you excerpted from HERA on the infamous succession clause. Introduction of this illegal aspect to HERA, if ever invoked in the Sweeney Court, will only serve as prima facie validation of the takings claims pending against FHFA and UST. DOJ attorneys, in any end game in a major jurisdiction and case, will never invoke this defense. It's fine for the peripheral cases and lower courts where government has argued all manner of conflicting opinions such as the FHFA is vs. the government isn't part of the Federal government depending on the narrative of the day.

"take over the assets" in the succession clause is a doomsday validation of government actions taken and will never be part of any final defense initiative from DOJ, IMO.