Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

Note

I can agree that some one should go right at HERA

I can agree that some one should argue against the Judicial injunction built into HERA

At same time - while HERA is the law of the land and the injunction against judicial intervention is in that law --- it behooves all the lawyers arguing to go at that prohibition to action directly. To make arguments about how ugly the NWS is but to avoid helping the judge figure a way around the prohibition on action is poor lawyering

Summary
I think the NWS is a taking and violates the constitution
I believe HERA was passed and signed by Bush in a legal fashion. If one accepts that - then until HERA is beaten up by a court or HERA is stripped of the judicial injunction "on judging the rightness of FHFA actions as conservator" - I find no reason to bad mouth judges who follow the law as written ................. I disagree but I am a liberal who is willing to look for true intent and not a conservative who is bound to the text and four corners ---- UNLESS outraged at the scope of the illegality as BROWN apparently was