InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4518
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2006

Re: ssc post# 16500

Tuesday, 11/13/2018 2:35:32 PM

Tuesday, November 13, 2018 2:35:32 PM

Post# of 18778

I agree Offor could afford to own more shares, but just as he stood aside and did not provide the critical financing that could have prevented the toxic debt fiasco, issuance of split-adjusted 300 billion shares, and destruction of 99%+ of shareholder value, there is no proof he has committed any additional funds this time.

There is proof that erhc now has almost 3 billion (300 billion split-adjusted) shares outstanding and nothing anywhere to document any change in the number of shares owned by Chrome or Offor since the last 10-K.

It appears you are the one trying to have it both ways. 1st using the latest 10-K to document Offor and Chrome ownership, then attempting to invalidate that same 10-K information by claiming it is not current. Sorry but one cannot have it both ways.



He is CEO of ERHC, and for just a fraction of what it used to cost, he can/has very likely picked up most of the shares. Why else would he make the effort and spend time on ERHC?

EVERBODY that spends time on ERHC, has a stake in ERHC...

***EVERYBODY***, ssc, everybody! No exceptions! None whatsoever. Do you catch my drift?

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.