InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 332
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/22/2014

Re: murocman post# 45683

Sunday, 11/11/2018 11:19:24 AM

Sunday, November 11, 2018 11:19:24 AM

Post# of 48316
At Melanoma Bridge Conference it's the old OMS-100 trial. We will gain more insights into the mechanisms, but the response rates are already known. IMHO not a catalyst.

https://ir.oncosec.com/press-releases/detail/1957/data-from-oncosecs-oms-100-clinical-trial-accepted-for



Edit: see here
https://propthink.com/whats-next-for-oncosec-following-premature-melanoma-data/ and esp. the conclusion ("... a market cap of ~$60 million ... about $35M in cash. With early TNBC data in December and updated melanoma data sometime in Q1 2019, we think selling at a panic point is foolish."). Please make your own opinion. The TNBC data is the n=10 sample and the article states that this might only be interesting if some more than the two already known patients received some checkpoint inhibitor therapy (currently we have no hints of this). The update on Pisces (expected by the article in Q1 2019) will be much more, highly relevant.

Besides that there theoretically could be some preclinical results (mouse data) on the next-gen therapy, but usually even these are presented in the context of a medical congress. And I would not call these too much of a catalyst (a little, but not as much as real trial data).
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ONCSQ News